shizikos daughter essays

shiziko's girl articles Shizukos Daughter, a novel composed by Kyoki Mori, is about an intense and splendid twelve-year-old Yuki Okundo who endures the loss of her mom by self destruction. Shizuko, Yukis mother, is a caring mother with imaginative gifts that she has given to her little girl. Yukis capacity to endure numerous misfortunes is tried by numerous variables, however principally by her inhumane dad and his new spouse. Yukis transitioning is the consequence of the assault on her moms memory, her dad and stepmothers activities, moms memory, and her moms self destruction. Yuki grows up solid and able, and Shizuko has urged her girl to be intense. Yuki battles young men and studies piano and she is additionally an exceptional understudy. Shizuko writes in her self destruction note, I don't do this imprudently, however after much thought. This is the best for us all. Kindly don't feel remorseful in any capacity. What has happened is altogether my obligation. This is simply the best just as for you. I am practically upbeat at this last hour and want you to be. Regardless of this, if it's not too much trouble trust I love you. Individuals will reveal to you that Ive done this in light of I don't adore you. Dont hear them out. At the point when you grow up to be a tough ladies, you will realize this was generally advantageous. My solitary concern currently is that you will be the first to discover me. Im sorry. Call your dad at work and let him deal with everything. You are a tough individual; you will no uncertainty get over this and be splendid ladies. Dont let me stop or defer you. I love you. (Mori 6) Once Shizuko is gone there are numerous things that undermine Yuki's turn of events. She should endure the annoying on her moms memory, first by her Aunt Aya who evacuates the assets of her dead mother, and afterward by the unpleasant Hanae. Upon the arrival of the memorial service, Yuki takes cover in her storage room loaded up with beautiful attire all made for her by Shizuko. In her storage room, with the sou... <!

Strategies for Supplier Relationship Management

Procedures for Supplier Relationship Management Provider Relationship Management (counting examination) is the administration a progressing business relationship to ensure upper hand for an association. The attention is on by and large connections between the provider and the purchasing association as opposed to an emphasis on a particular agreement. Its point is to help buying and business the executives to build up an efficient comprehension of the idea of current connections that exist inside and between the association and the providers (OGC, 2009). Provider relationship the board is an exhaustive way to deal with dealing with a ventures collaborations with the associations that flexibly the merchandise and enterprises it employments. The objective of provider relationship the executives (SRM) is to smooth out and make increasingly viable the procedures between an undertaking and its providers similarly as client relationship the board (CRM) is proposed to smooth out and make progressively compelling the procedures between an endeavor and its clients (SAP 2008). Purchasing associations have a need to oversee their agreements as well as their providers. Various providers will have different legally binding associations with singular divisions and it is in this way significant for them to be proactively overseen. The procedure will be upheld by data produced from the presentation the board game plans that will be set up for every one of the agreements, however this procedure is significantly more about the general relationship instead of on action on a particular agreement (SAP.com 2008). Destinations The destinations for SRM include: Decrease in costs Administration improvement Arrangement improvement Adaptability and common advantage (Adjusted from Procurement Leadership 2006) There will likewise be the open door for development in the general relationship with the provider advancing toward expanded banding together sort game plans. This will conceivably include: Set up correspondence channels at all levels, up to and including CEO, between the associations Joint arranging and estimating at a vital level Expanded trust Upgraded communitarian approaches and viewpoint Improved an incentive for the two gatherings (Adjusted from OGC 2009) Provider Relationship Management (SRM) is planned for smoothing out the gracefully chain by improving the correspondence between a venture and its providers. (Acquisition - LEADERS, 2006). It smoothes out the procedures between an endeavor and its providers similarly Customer Relationship Management (CRM) makes the procedures between an undertaking and its clients progressively powerful. In established truth SRM rehearses empower a typical casing of reference to improve correspondence among big business and provider who might be utilized to various practices and wording. In the end SRM programming can bring down creation expenses and result in a more excellent, lower valued final result (SAP 2008). Current SRM arrangements bolster the entire obtainment process in the organization, including acquirement system, capability of reasonable providers, tenders and agreement structure, and observing provider execution. 2.2 THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPLEMENTING SRM STRATEGY/PLAN SRM is getting continuously progressively significant for ventures in light of the fact that, in the serious worldwide condition, buying related investment funds are similarly significant as deals. In the previous ten years, huge outcomes have been produced through excusing gracefully bases, acquainting rivalry and moving with minimal effort nations. Be that as it may, as of late outcomes from these exercises are decreasing, which is the place SRM comes in (PROCUREMENT LEADERS 2006). When SRM is viable, organizations enhance productivity, development, piece of the overall industry and notoriety. SRM is particularly significant when there is a constrained flexibly base for an item and for this situation, the nut organization has one gracefully and it is a significant need of the nut organization to keep up a decent connection with the gracefully. This is to state that the helpful society has a full syndication on the gracefully of nuts to Peanutty. A decent relationship is important to maintain a strategic distance from abrupt increment in value, flexibly of value items, and furthermore the gracefully can choose not to gracefully to Peanutty. They along these lines have a need to oversee their agreements as well as their providers. There will likewise be the open door for development in the general relationship with the provider advancing toward expanded collaborating type arrangements.ã‚â This will possibly include: Built up correspondence channels at all levels, up to and including CEO, between the associations Joint arranging and estimating at a key level. Peanutty ought to urge their providers to concentrate more on the vital way to agreeable achievement and upgraded synergistic methodologies and point of view Expanded trust between the provider and Peanutty, by discovering bargain answers for issues upgrade both Peanutty Company and the helpful provider progress in the direction of accomplishing the drawn out advantages Improved an incentive for the two gatherings, the interest of the item upgrades the capacity of both Peanutty and the helpful provider to have a reasonable vision towards its advantages. 3.0 QUESTION 2: What exercises could be created by Peanutty to lessen or deal with the intensity of its clients to limit chances and boost gainfulness? Peanutty is a producer of elements for the food business and furthermore a specialist co-op of food things for huge organizations in the part. Peanutty should utilize the techniques of client relationship the executives (CRM). 3.1 CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT Client Relationship Management, or CRM, is a significant piece of present day business the board. Client Relationship Management concerns the connection between the association and its clients. Clients are the soul of any association be it a worldwide company with a huge number of workers and a multi-billion turnover, or a sole dealer with a bunch of normal clients. Client Relationship Management is the equivalent on a basic level for these two models it is the extent of CRM which can fluctuate radically. Client Relationship Management centers around the relationship Effective associations utilize three stages to construct client connections: decide commonly fulfilling objectives among association and clients build up and keep up client compatibility produce positive sentiments in the association and the clients In the business world, the association and the clients both have sets of conditions to consider when assembling the relationship, for example, needs and needs of the two gatherings these conditions incorporate; associations need to make a benefit to endure and develop clients need great assistance, a quality item and an adequate cost CRM can majorly affect an association through: moving the concentration from item to client, smoothing out the proposal to what the client requires, not need the association can make and furthermore featuring capabilities required for a powerful CRM process A definitive reason for CRM, similar to any hierarchical activity, is to expand benefit. On account of CRM this is accomplished for the most part by offering a superior assistance to your clients than your rivals. CRM not just improves the administration to clients however; a great CRM ability will likewise decrease costs, wastage, and grumblings (in spite of the fact that you may see some expansion at first, basically on the grounds that you find out about things that without CRM would have remained covered up). Powerful CRM additionally lessens staff pressure, since steady loss a significant reason for pressure diminishes as administrations and connections improve. CRM empowers moment statistical surveying also: opening the lines of interchanges with your clients gives you direct steady market response to your items, administrations and execution, obviously better than any market overview. Great CRM likewise encourages you develop your business: clients remain with you longer; clie nt beat rates lessen; referrals to new clients increment from expanding quantities of fulfilled clients; request decreases on putting out fires and inconvenience shooting staff, and by and large the associations administration streams and groups work all the more productively and all the more cheerfully. 3.2 Features of good CRM The old perspective in industry was: Heres what we can make who needs to purchase our item? The new perspective in industry is: What precisely do our clients need and need? what's more, What do we have to do to have the option to create and convey it to our clients? This is a critical difference in worldview and a quantum jump as far as what we look like at our business action. What do clients need? Most clearly, and this is the degree of numerous providers observations, clients need savvy items or administrations that convey expected advantages to them. (Advantages are what the items or administrations accomplish for the clients.) Note that any single item or administration can convey various advantages to various clients. Its essential to take a gander at things from the clients point of view even at this level. All the more fundamentally in any case, clients need to have their requirements fulfilled. Clients needs are particularly unique to and far more extensive than an item or administration, and the highlights and advantages enveloped. Clients needs by and large reach out to issues a long ways past the providers recommendation, and will regularly incorporate the purchasing selling process (before giving anything), how interchanges are taken care of, and the idea of the client provider relationship. Current CRM hypothesis alludes to incorporating the client. This better approach for taking a gander at the business includes coordinating the client (all the more absolutely the clients significant individuals and procedures) into all parts of the providers business, and the other way around. This infers a relationship that is more profound and more extensive than the customary a manageable distance provider client relationship. The customary way to deal with client connections depended on a straightforward exchange or exchange, and minimal more. Maybe there would be just a transgression

Naltrexone Treatment for Opioid Addiction and Alcoholism

Naltrexone Treatment for Opioid Addiction and Alcoholism Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Print Naltrexone for Alcoholism and Opioid Addiction By Buddy T facebook twitter Buddy T is an anonymous writer and founding member of the Online Al-Anon Outreach Committee with decades of experience writing about alcoholism. Learn about our editorial policy Buddy T Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Steven Gans, MD on December 10, 2015 Steven Gans, MD is board-certified in psychiatry and is an active supervisor, teacher, and mentor at Massachusetts General Hospital. Learn about our Medical Review Board Steven Gans, MD Updated on February 03, 2020 Getty Images More in Addiction Coping and Recovery Methods and Support Overcoming Addiction Personal Stories Alcohol Use Addictive Behaviors Drug Use Nicotine Use In This Article Table of Contents Expand Uses Effectiveness Indications Dosage Side Effects View All Back To Top Naltrexone is a drug used primarily in the continued management of alcohol dependence and opioid addiction. How it helps in each case differs. For alcoholism, the treatment can help quell ones desire to drink. In contrast, the drug works to actually thwart the actual effects of opiates on the brain. Naltrexone is sold under the brand names Revia and Depade. An extended-release form is marketed under the trade name Vivitrol. Uses Naltrexone does not treat alcohol or drug withdrawal symptoms, but can help people whove already stopped using remain drug- or alcohol-free. For people whove stopped drinking, naltrexone reduces the craving for alcohol that  many alcohol-dependent people experience when they quit drinking. Its not fully understood how the drug reduces the craving for alcohol, but some scientists believe it works by decreasing the reinforcing effects of alcohol in certain neural pathways in the brain.?? This mechanism  involves the  neurotransmitter dopamine. Naltrexone also works to block the effects of opiate drugs like heroin and cocaine in the brain. As part of a class of drugs known as opiate antagonists, naltrexone competes with these drugs for opiate receptors in the brain to prevent the feelings of pleasure the substances produce.?? Effectiveness Research has shown that naltrexone can reduce cravings for alcohol and drugs for some people, but it doesnt work for everyone. Like most pharmaceutical treatments for alcohol and drug abuse, it works best if used in connection with an overall treatment regime, such as psychosocial therapy, counseling, and/or support group participation. Naltrexone does not cure addiction, but it has helped many who suffer from alcohol or drug addiction to maintain abstinence by reducing their craving for alcohol or drugs. Indications Naltrexone is prescribed only after youve stopped drinking alcohol or taking opioids for seven to 10 days because it can cause serious withdrawal symptoms if taken while youre still using drugs.?? People who have acute hepatitis, liver disease, or kidney disease should not take naltrexone.?? Patients who are using narcotic painkillers should not take it nor should anyone who is allergic to any other drugs. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding should not take naltrexone. Dosage In pill form, naltrexone is usually prescribed to be taken once a day. Studies have looked at the use of naltrexone over a 12-week period to help people who have stopped drinking to reduce the craving for alcohol during the early days of abstinence when the risk of a relapse is the greatest, but doctors may prescribe it to be used for longer. Because naltrexone blocks the effects of opioids, its also sometimes prescribed for extended periods for people trying to manage drug dependence. In April 2006, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a once-a-month injectable form of naltrexone (Vivitrol) for the treatment of alcohol dependence. Several studies demonstrated the monthly injection form of naltrexone was more effective in maintaining abstinence over the pill form because it eliminates the problem of medication compliance. Rapid Detoxification An implant form of naltrexone is used in a controversial process called rapid detoxification for opioid dependence. In rapid detox, youre placed under general anesthesia and a naltrexone implant is surgically placed in your lower abdomen or posterior. This procedure is usually followed by daily doses of naltrexone for up to 12 months. The FDA has not approved the implant form of naltrexone. Although the rapid detox procedure is promoted as a one-time cure for drug addiction, research has shown that its really more effective as an initial step in a long-term rehabilitation process.?? Side Effects Naltrexone can cause upset stomach, nervousness, anxiety, or muscle and joint pain. Usually, these symptoms are mild and temporary, but for some people, they can be more severe and longer-lasting. In rare cases, naltrexone causes more severe side effects including:?? ConfusionDrowsinessHallucinationsVomitingStomach painSkin rashDiarrheaBlurred vision Contact your doctor immediately if you experience any of these symptoms. Large doses of naltrexone can cause liver failure. You should stop taking naltrexone immediately if you experience symptoms such as: Excessive tirednessUnusual bleeding or bruisingLoss of appetitePain in the upper right part of the stomachDark urineYellowing of the skin or eyes. Read the full list of symptoms provided with your prescription information.

Li Ning in with Nike and Adidas to Carve Up Sportswear Market - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 1 Words: 301 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2017/09/14 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? Brand loyalty is stronger for Li Ning than for the two leading foreign brands, suggesting that modern marketing strategy is taking hold on the Chinese mainland much more quickly than had previously been anticipated. A study jointly undertaken by Horizon Research and Horizonkey. com on leading sports shoe brands in 2003, Li Ning leads in brand loyalty with 53. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Li Ning in with Nike and Adidas to Carve Up Sportswear Market" essay for you Create order 4%, followed by Adidas and Nike with 39. 8% and 39. 1% respectively. However, two other domestic brands Shuangxing and Anta are not faring too well in the loyalty stakes, scoring 13. % and 15. 1% respectively, but that could be down to the fact that sufficient work has not been done as yet to position them in the market, and may also reflect the fewer competitive features that these smaller brands can offer. Analysis of market competition between different brands shows that, for all purposes, Li Ning is already on a par with international heavyweights in all departments and has become their major rival in China. Anta, Shuangxing and other domestic brands that target the lower end of the market are no match for Nike, Adidas and other big names, nor pose any substantive pressure on these brands. Analysis of foreign brands shows that among non-loyal consumers of Nike (those who buy Nike sports clothing but other brands of sports shoes or buy Nike shoes but other brands of sports clothing), over 50% have switched allegiance to domestic brands while less than 50% have chosen foreign brands. Further studies found that the majority of those who switched allegiance to domestic brands mainly turned to the domestic market leader Li Ning. So, Li Ning is the major competitor for Nike, and its threat to Nike even surpasses that of the latters long-time rivalry with Adidas. But Nike cannot overlook Adidas, because those who switched to foreign brands actually ended up choosing Adidas.

Essay on Civil Liberties During World War One - 798 Words

Mackenzie Deane Period 4 Civil Liberties during World War One According to the Bill of Rights, â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.† Nowhere in the First Amendment does it state that in times of war, the government can change the laws that have been made to protect the people of the United States. Although some thought President Wilson’s actions were just, he did not abide by the rules of the First Amendment, and because of that, he went too far in limiting people’s civil liberties during World War†¦show more content†¦If this is hard to believe, the case of Eugene Debs demonstrates how it was done. Debs lectured fellow socialists on the detriments of the draft. In his speech he stated, â€Å"The poor, ignorant serfs had been taught to revere their masters; to believe that wh en their masters declared war upon another, it was their patriotic duty to fall upon one another†¦ The master class has always declared the wars; the subject class has always fought the battles†¦ I would rather a thousand times be a free soul in jail than to be a sycophant and coward in the streets†. Debs did just that, this speech cost him ten years in prison. Many would say that he was only speaking his mind, and he should be able to do that, but the government had most power, and they got the final say. Charles Schenck had a similar case. While passing out pamphlets giving men reasons to not join the army, he was arrested and charged with violating the Espionage Act. Again, he was only trying to inform people of the disturbing side of the war. After the Espionage Act, came the Sedition Act in 1918. The Sedition Act did not allow language â€Å"tending to incite, provoke, and encourage resistance to the United States in said war†. This Act infringed further on people’s First Amendment rights. Individuals’ abilities to express themselves were curtailed. One of the people that went against this Act was Joseph Abrams. Abrams was a Russian immigrant who did not agree with the Americans invading Russia. Because of this,Show MoreRelatedCivil Liberties During World War II1665 Words   |  7 Pagesstand for justice and recognize that serious injustices were done to Japanese Americans during World War II. --President George H.W. Bush, 1988 Many times in history the Supreme Court has been faced with deciding how to treat civil liberties during war time. This raises the question, what restrictions if any should the court allow during wartime. The court is faced with making the decision on civil liberties during wartime for security reasons, and to protect the rights of the individual. While someRead MoreThe Abolition Of The Civil War1679 Words   |  7 PagesDuring the mid 1800s, the issue of slavery and its expansion had become a major controversial element of American history, resulting in the transpiration of the Civil War. Between the years of 1861 and 1865, conflict between the North and South had emerged, causing bloodshed at America’s most dominant period of history. Throughout the year 1861, intense conflict between the North and South over issues of states’ liberties, federal power, westward expansion, and slavery had impelled the Civil WarRead MoreThe American Civil Liberties Union1714 Words    |  7 PagesThe American Civil Liberties Union is a large and influential non-profit organization that was founded in 1920. The American Civil Liberties Union is a nonpartisan group that serves to protect the individual rights and liberties of American citizens and is considered a powerful interest group, especially within movements that advocate civil rights and civil liberty. Ginsberg, Lowi, Weir, and Tolbert define interests group as â€Å"individuals who organize to influence the government’s program and policies†Read MoreCivil Liberties And The Government Of The United States1178 Words   |  5 Pagesthe United States has in the past overreacted in times of war and crisis, and has seriously violated many civil liberties. A democracy requires high levels of civil rights, liberties, and political openness in order for its citizens to fully participate in political election, and other governmental activities; however, the demands of national security usually require much less openness, secrecy, and limitations on civil rights and liberties. Throughout history there have been times were large numbersRead MoreThe United States Treatment of Japanese Americans During World War II1216 Words   |  5 Pagesorder in stride. There was resistance by the Japanese to the government policy and lawsuits were filed going all the way to the Supreme Court. In recent history, the Supreme Court has reversed a few judgments from the 1940s. The question of civil liberties over national security of the Japanese Americans in the 1940s is parallel to Arab Americans after September 11, 2001. There are several military and constitutional justifications the United States government had in placing the Japanese in internmentsRead MoreThe American Civil Liberties Union1418 Words   |  6 Pagesfirst set their eyes on the 20th century, they hoped for a better life without war and a prospering economy. This vision of freedom and liberty in America was quite bold, knowing there were challenges ahead. There’s always a price to pay and obstacles to go through when the circumstances are not ideal. During the early 1900s, our country was evolving and starting a new era. An era where blacks were no longer slaves, civil rights movements were occurring, and citizens were having issues with the lawRead MoreCivil War702 Words   |  3 PagesConfederates reunion in New Orleans, 1903The Civil War is one of the central events in Americas collective memory. There are innumerable statues, commemorations, books and archival collections. The memory includes the home front, military aff airs, the treatment of soldiers, both living and dead, in the wars aftermath, depictions of the war in literature and art, evaluations of heroes and villains, and considerations of the moral and political lessons of the war.[247] The last theme includes moral evaluationsRead MoreA Lesson Before Dying, by Ernest J. Gaines Essay1011 Words   |  5 Pagesregistration systems, but it only started there. The novel A Lesson Before Dying is about a young, college-educated man and a convict, Grant Wiggins and Jefferson. Grant is asked to make a man out of Jefferson who is convicted of killing a white man during a robbery in which he got dragged along to. Grant is asked by Emma Lou to make a man out of Jefferson, so if anything, Jefferson can die with dignity. Something that he was striped of when he was tried and his attorney used the defence that he isRead MoreThe Long Road to Freedom1333 Words   |  5 PagesFreedom Freedom, the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. Freedom is more than the power to act, speak, or think as one wants, but it is also the right of one to do anything they please as long as it does not infringe upon another humans rights. Basic freedoms are those such as; freedom of religion, press, speech, assembly, petition, thought, expression, and opinion. These rights are only those given to the Americans through the constitution, butRead MoreSecurity versus Liberty in the US Fight Against Terror Essay760 Words   |  4 Pagesnever been more relevant than after the war against terror gave the government reason to increase the surveillance. The war against terror is bringing us closer to Orwells dystopian society. Do we have to pay this high price to win the war against terror? After 9/11, the USA and the rest of the world were in shock. To keep the American people calm the government had to act fast. On the same day as the attack of the Twin Towers, President George W. Bush declared war on terrorism. On October the 26th 2001

Accrual Swaps Free Essays

ACCRUAL SWAPS AND RANGE NOTES PATRICK S. HAGAN BLOOMBERG LP 499 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NY 10022 PHAGAN1@BLOOMBERG. NET 212-893-4231 Abstract. We will write a custom essay sample on Accrual Swaps or any similar topic only for you Order Now Here we present the standard methodology for pricing accrual swaps, range notes, and callable accrual swaps and range notes. Key words. range notes, time swaps, accrual notes 1. Introduction. 1. 1. Notation. In our notation today is always t = 0, and (1. 1a) D(T ) = today’s discount factor for maturity T. For any date t in the future, let Z(t; T ) be the value of $1 to be delivered at a later date T : (1. 1b) Z(t; T ) = zero coupon bond, maturity T , as seen at t. These discount factors and zero coupon bonds are the ones obtained from the currency’s swap curve. Clearly D(T ) = Z(0; T ). We use distinct notation for discount factors and zero coupon bonds to remind ourselves that discount factors D(T ) are not random; we can always obtain the current discount factors from the stripper. Zero coupon bonds Z(t; T ) are random, at least until time catches up to date t. Let (1. 2a) (1. 2b) These are de? ned via (1. 2c) D(T ) = e? T 0 f0 (T ) = today’s instantaneous forward rate for date T, f (t; T ) = instantaneous forward rate for date T , as seen at t. f0 (T 0 )dT 0 Z(t; T ) = e? T t f (t,T 0 )dT 0 . 1. 2. Accrual swaps (? xed). ?j t0 t1 t2 †¦ tj-1 tj †¦ tn-1 tn period j Coupon leg schedule Fixed coupon accrual swaps (aka time swaps) consist of a coupon leg swapped against a funding leg. Suppose that the agreed upon reference rate is, say, k month Libor. Let (1. 3) t0 t1 t2  ·  ·  · tn? 1 tn 1 Rfix Rmin Rmax L(? ) Fig. 1. 1. Daily coupon rate be the schedule of the coupon leg, and let the nominal ? xed rate be Rf ix . Also let L(? st ) represent the k month Libor rate ? xed for the interval starting at ? st and ending at ? end (? st ) = ? t + k months. Then the coupon paid for period j is (1. 4a) where (1. 4b) and (1. 4c) ? j = #days ? st in the interval with Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax . Mj ? j = cvg(tj? 1 , tj ) = day count fraction for tj? 1 to tj , Cj = ? j Rf ix ? j paid at tj , Here Mj is the total number of days in interval j, and Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax is the agreed-upon accrual range. Said another way, each day ? st in the j th period contibutes the amount ? ?j Rf ix 1 if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax (1. 5) 0 otherwise Mj to the coupon paid on date tj . For a standard deal, the leg’s schedule is contructed like a standard swap schedule. The theoretical dates (aka nominal dates) are constructed monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, or annually (depending on the contract terms) backwards from the â€Å"theoretical end date. † Any odd coupon is a stub (short period) at the front, unless the contract explicitly states long ? rst, short last, or long last. The modi? ed following business day convention is used to obtain the actual dates tj from the theoretical dates. The coverage (day count fraction) is adjusted, that is, the day count fraction for period j is calculated from the actual dates tj? 1 and tj , not the theoretical dates. Also, L(? t ) is the ? xing that pertains to periods starting on date ? st , regardless of whether ? st is a good business day or not. I. e. , the rate L(? st ) set for a Friday start also pertains for the following Saturday and Sunday. Like all ? xed legs, there are many variants of these coupon legs. The only variations that do not make sense for coupon legs are â€Å"set-in-arrearsâ €  and â€Å"compounded. † There are three variants that occur relatively frequently: Floating rate accrual swaps. Minimal coupon accrual swaps. Floating rate accrual swaps are like ordinary accrual swaps except that at the start of each period, a ? ating rate is set, and this rate plus a margin is 2 used in place of the ? xed rate Rf ix . Minimal coupon accrual swaps receive one rate each day Libor sets within the range and a second, usually lower rate, when Libor sets outside the range ? j Mj ? Rf ix Rf loor if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax . otherwise (A standard accrual swap has Rf loor = 0. These deals are analyzed in Appendix B. Range notes. In the above deals, the funding leg is a standard ?oating leg plus a margin. A range note is a bond which pays the coupon leg on top of the principle repayments; there is no ? oating leg. For these deals, the counterparty’s credit-worthiness is a key concern. To determine the correct value of a range note, one needs to use an option adjusted spread (OAS) to re? ect the extra discounting re? ecting the counterparty’s credit spread, bond liquidity, etc. See section 3. Other indices. CMS and CMT accrual swaps. Accrual swaps are most commonly written using 1m, 3m, 6m, or 12m Libor for the reference rate L(? st ). However, some accrual swaps use swap or treasury rates, such as the 10y swap rate or the 10y treasury rate, for the reference rate L(? st ). These CMS or CMT accrual swaps are not analyzed here (yet). There is also no reason why the coupon cannot set on other widely published indices, such as 3m BMA rates, the FF index, or the OIN rates. These too will not be analyzed here. 2. Valuation. We value the coupon leg by replicating the payo? in terms of vanilla caps and ? oors. Consider the j th period of a coupon leg, and suppose the underlying indice is k-month Libor. Let L(? st ) be the k-month Libor rate which is ? xed for the period starting on date ? st and ending on ? end (? st ) = ? st +k months. The Libor rate will be ? xed on a date ? f ix , which is on or a few days before ? st , depending on currency. On this date, the value of the contibution from day ? st is clearly ? ? ? j Rf ix V (? f ix ; ? st ) = payo? = Z(? f ix ; tj ) Mj ? 0 if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax otherwise (2. 1) , where ? f ix the ? xing date for ? st . We value coupon j by replicating each day’s contribution in terms of vanilla caplets/? oorlets, and then summing over all days ? st in the period. Let Fdig (t; ? st , K) be the value at date t of a digital ? oorlet on the ? oating rate L(? st ) with strike K. If the Libor rate L(? st ) is at or below the strike K, the digital ? oorlet pays 1 unit of currency on the end date ? end (? st ) of the k-month interval. Otherwise the digital pays nothing. So on the ? xing date ? f ix the payo? is known to be ? 1 if L(? st ) ? K , (2. 2) Fdig (? f ix ; ? st , K) = Z(? f ix ; ? end ) 0 otherwise We can replicate the range note’s payo? for date ? st by going long and short digitals struck at Rmax and Rmin . This yields, (2. 3) (2. 4) ? j Rf ix [Fdig (? f ix ; ? st , Rmax ) ? Fdig (? f ix ; ? st , Rmin )] Mj ? ?j Rf ix 1 = Z(? f ix ; ? end ) 0 Mj 3 if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax . otherwise This is the same payo? as the range note, except that the digitals pay o? on ? end (? st ) instead of tj . 2. 1. Hedging considerations. Before ? ing the date mismatch, we note that digital ? oorlets are considered vanilla instruments. This is because they can be replicated to arbitrary accuracy by a bullish spread of ? oorlets. Let F (t, ? st , K) be the value on date t of a standard ? oorlet with strike K on the ? oating + rate L(? st ). This ? oorlet pays ? [K ? L(? st )] on the end date ? end (? st ) of the k-m onth interval. So on the ? xing date, the payo? is known to be (2. 5a) F (? f ix ; ? st , K) = ? [K ? L(? st )] Z(? f ix ; ? end ). + Here, ? is the day count fraction of the period ? st to ? end , (2. 5b) ? = cvg(? st , ? end ). 1 ? oors struck at K + 1 ? nd short the same number struck 2 The bullish spread is constructed by going long at K ? 1 ?. This yields the payo? 2 (2. 6) which goes to the digital payo? as ? 0. Clearly the value of the digital ? oorlet is the limit as ? 0 of (2. 7a) Fcen (t; ? st , K, ? ) = ? 1  © F (t; ? st , K + 1 ? ) ? F (t; ? st , K ? 1 ? ) . 2 2 ? 1  © F (? f ix ; ? st , K + 1 ? ) ? F (? f ix ; ? st , K ? 1 ? ) 2 2 ? ? ? ? 1 ? 1 = Z(? f ix ; ? end ) K + 1 ? ? L(? st ) 2 ? ? ? 0 if K ? 1 ? L(? st ) K + 1 ? , 2 2 if K + 1 ? L(? st ) 2 if L(? st ) K ? 1 ? 2 Thus the bullish spread, and its limit, the digitial ? orlet, are directly determined by the market prices of vanilla ? oors on L(? st ). Digital ? oorlets may develop an unbounded ? -risk a s the ? xing date is approached. To avoid this di? culty, most ? rms book, price, and hedge digital options as bullish ? oorlet spreads. I. e. , they book and hedge the digital ? oorlet as if it were the spread in eq. 2. 7a with ? set to 5bps or 10bps, depending on the aggressiveness of the ? rm. Alternatively, some banks choose to super-replicate or sub-replicate the digital, by booking and hedging it as (2. 7b) or (2. 7c) Fsub (t; ? st , K, ? ) = 1 {F (t; ? st , K) ? F (t; ? st , K ? ?)} Fsup (t; ? st , K, ? ) = 1 {F (t; ? st , K + ? ) ? F (t; ? st , K)} depending on which side they own. One should price accrual swaps in accordance with a desk’s policy for using central- or super- and sub-replicating payo? s for other digital caplets and ? oorlets. 2. 2. Handling the date mismatch. We re-write the coupon leg’s contribution from day ? st as ? ?j Rf ix Z(? f ix ; tj ) ? V (? f ix ; ? st ) = Z(? f ix ; ? end ) Mj Z(? f ix ; ? end ) ? 0 4 (2. 8) if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax otherwise . f(t,T) L(? ) tj-1 ? tj ? end T Fig. 2. 1. Date mismatch is corrected assuming only parallel shifts in the forward curve The ratio Z(? ix ; tj )/Z(? f ix ; ? end ) is the manifestation of the date mismatch. To handle this mismatch, we approximate the ratio by assuming that the yield curve makes only parallel shifts over the relevent interval. See ?gure 2. 1. So suppose we are at date t0 . Then we assume that (2. 9a) Z(? f ix ; tj ) Z(t0 ; tj ) ? [L(? st )? Lf (t0 ,? st )](tj en d ) = e Z(? f ix ; ? end ) Z(t0 ; ? end ) Z(t0 ; tj ) = {1 + [L(? st ) ? Lf (t0 , ? st )](? end ? tj ) +  ·  ·  · } . Z(t0 ; ? end ) Z(t0 ; ? st ) ? Z(t0 ; ? end ) + bs(? st ), ? Z(t0 ; ? end ) Here (2. 9b) Lf (t0 , ? st ) ? is the forward rate for the k-month period starting at ? t , as seen at the current date t0 , bs(? st ) is the ? oating rate’s basis spread, and (2. 9c) ? = cvg(? st , ? end ), is the day count fraction for ? st to ? end . Since L(? st ) = Lf (? f ix , ? st ) represents the ? oating rate which is actually ? xed on the ? xing date ? ex , 2. 9a just assumes that any change in the yield curve between tj and ? end is the same as the change Lf (? f ix , ? st ) ? Lf (t0 , ? st ) in the reference rate between the observation date t0 , and the ? xing date ? f ix . See ? gure 2. 1. We actually use a slightly di? erent approximation, (2. 10a) where (2. 10b) ? = ? end ? tj . ? end ? ? st Z(? ix ; tj ) Z(t0 ; tj ) 1 + L(? st ) ? Z(? f ix ; ? end ) Z(t0 ; ? end ) 1 + Lf (t0 , ? st ) We prefer this approximation because it is the only linear approximation which accounts for the day count basis correctly, is exact for both ? st = tj? 1 and ? st = tj , and is centerred around the current forward value for the range note. 5 Rfix Rmin L0 Rmax L(? ) Fig. 2. 2. E? ective contribution from a single day ? , after accounting for the date mis-match. With this approximation, the payo? from day ? st is ? 1 + L(? st ) (2. 11a) V (? f ix ; ? ) = A(t0 , ? st )Z(? f ix ; ? end ) 0 as seen at date t0 . Here the e? ctive notional is (2. 11b) A(t0 , ? st ) = if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax otherwise 1 ? j Rf ix Z(t0 ; tj ) . Mj Z(t0 ; ? end ) 1 + Lf (t0 , ? st ) We can replicate this digital-linear-digital payo? by using a combination of two digital ? oorlets and two standard ? oorlets. Consider the combination (2. 12) V (t; ? st ) ? A(t0 , ? st ) {(1 + Rmax )Fdig (t, ? st ; Rmax ) ? (1 + ? Rmin )Fdig (t, ? st ; Rmin ) F (t, ? st ; Rmax ) + ? F (t, ? st ; Rmi n ). Setting t to the ? xing date ? f ix shows that this combination matches the contribution from day ? st in eq. 2. 11a. Therefore, this formula gives the value of the contribution of day ? t for all earlier dates t0 ? t ? ? f ix as well. Alternatively, one can replicate the payo? as close as one wishes by going long and short ? oorlet spreads centerred around Rmax and Rmin . Consider the portfolio (2. 13a) A(t0 , ? st )  © ? V (t; ? st , ? ) = a1 (? st )F (t; ? st , Rmax + 1 ? ) ? a2 (? st )F (t; ? st , Rmax ? 1 ? ) 2 2 ? 1 ? a3 (? st )F (t; ? st , Rmin + 2 ? )+ a4 (? st )F (t; ? st , Rmin ? 1 ? ) 2 a1 (? st ) = 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ), 2 a3 (? st ) = 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ), 2 ? ? a2 (? st ) = 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ), 2 a4 (? st ) = 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ). 2 with (2. 13b) (2. 13c) Setting t to ? ix yields (2. 14) ? V = A(t0 , ? st )Z(? f ix ; ? end ) 0 if L(? st ) Rmin ? 1 ? 2 1 + L(? st ) if Rmin + 1 ? L(? st ) Rmax ? 1 ? , 2 2 ? 0 if Rmax + 1 ? L(? st ) 2 6 with linear ramps between Rmin ? 1 ? L(? st ) Rmin + 1 ? and Rmax ? 1 ? L(? st ) Rmax + 1 ?. As 2 2 2 2 above, most banks would choose to use the ? oorlet spreads (with ? being 5bps or 10bps) instead of using the more troublesome digitals. For a bank insisting on using exact digital options, one can take ? to be 0. 5bps to replicate the digital accurately.. We now just need to sum over all days ? t in period j and all periods j in the coupon leg, (2. 15) Vcpn (t) = n X This formula replicates the value of the range note in terms of vanilla ? oorlets. These ? oorlet prices should be obtained directly from the marketplace using market quotes for the implied volatilities at the relevent strikes. Of course the centerred spreads could be replaced by super-replicating or sub-replicating ? oorlet spreads, bringing the pricing in line with the bank’s policies. Finally, we need to value the funding leg of the accrual swap. For most accrual swaps, the funding leg ? ? pays ? oating plus a margin. Let the fundin g leg dates be t0 , t1 , . . , tn . Then the funding leg payments are (2. 16) f ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )[Ri lt + mi ]  ¤ A(t0 , ? st )  ©? 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) F (t; ? st , Rmax + 1 ? ) 2 2 j=1 ? st =tj? 1 +1 ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) F (t; ? st , Rmax ? 1 ? ) 2 2 ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) F (t; ? st , Rmin + 1 ? ) 2 2 ?  ¤ ? + 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) F (t; ? st , Rmin ? 1 ? ) . 2 2 tj X ? paid at ti , i = 1, 2, †¦ , n, ? f ? ? where Ri lt is the ? oating rate’s ? xing for the period ti? 1 t ti , and the mi is the margin. The value of the funding leg is just n ? X i=1 (2. 17a) Vf und (t) = ? ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(ri + mi )Z(t; ti ), ? ? where, by de? ition, ri is the forward value of the ? oating rate for period ti? 1 t ti : (2. 17b) ri = ? ? Z(t; ti? 1 ) ? Z(t; ti ) true + bs0 . + bs0 = ri i i ? ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )Z(t; ti ) true is the true (cash) rate. This sum Here bs0 is the basis spread for the funding leg’s ? oating rate, and ri i collapses to n ? X i=1 (2. 18a) Vf und (t) = Z(t; t0 ) ? Z(t; tn ) + ? ? ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(bs0 +mi )Z(t; ti ). i If we include only the funding leg payments for i = i0 to n, the value is ? (2. 18b) ? Vf und (t) = Z(t; ti0 ? 1 ) ? Z(t; tn ) + ? n ? X ? ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(bs0 +mi )Z(t; ti ). i i=i0 2. 2. 1. Pricing notes. Caplet/? oorlet prices are normally quoted in terms of Black vols. Suppose that on date t, a ? oorlet with ? xing date tf ix , start date ? st , end date ? end , and strike K has an implied vol of ? imp (K) ? ? imp (? st , K). Then its market price is (2. 19a) F (t, ? st , K) = ? Z(t; ? end ) {KN (d1 ) ? L(t, ? )N (d2 )} , 7 where (2. 19b) Here (2. 19c) d1,2 = log K/L(t, ? st )  ± 1 ? 2 (K)(tf ix ? t) 2 imp , v ? imp (K) tf ix ? t Z(t; ? st ) ? Z(t; ? end ) + bs(? st ) ? Z(t; ? end ) L(t, ? st ) = is ? oorlet’s forward rate as seen at date t. Today’s ? oorlet value is simply (2. 20a) where (2. 20b) d1,2 = log K/L0 (? st )  ± 1 ? (K)tf ix 2 imp , v ? imp (K) tf ix D(? st ) ? D(? end ) + bs(? st ). ?D(? end ) ? j Rf ix D(tj ) 1 . Mj D(? end ) 1 + L0 (? st ) F (0, ? st , K) = ? D(? end ) {KN (d1 ) ? L0 (? )N (d2 )} , and where today’s forward Libor rate is (2. 20c) L0 (? st ) = To obtain today’s price of the accrual swap, note that the e? ective notional for period j is (2. 21) A(0, ? st ) = as seem today. See 2. 11b. Putting this together with 2. 13a shows that today’s price is Vcpn (0) ? Vf und (0), where (2. 22a) Vcpn (0) = n X ? j Rf ix D(tj ) j=1 Mj  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) B1 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) B2 (? st ) 2 2 ? [1 + L0 (? st )] ? t =tj? 1 +1  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) B3 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) B4 (? st ) 2 2 ? , ? [1 + L0 (? st )] tj X n ? X i=1 (2. 22b) Vf und (0) = D(t0 ) ? D(tn ) + ? ? ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(bs0 +mi )D(ti ). i Here B? are Black’s formula at strikes around the boundaries: (2. 22c) (2. 22d) with (2. 22e) K1,2 = Rmax  ± 1 ? , 2 K3,4 = Rmin  ± 1 ?. 2 B? (? st ) = K? N (d? ) ? L0 (? st )N (d? ) 1 2 d? = 1,2 log K? /L0 (? st )  ± 1 ? 2 (K? )tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K? ) tf ix Calculating the sum of each day’s contribution is very tedious. Normally, one calculates each day’s contribution for the current period and two or three months afterward. After that, one usually replaces the sum over dates ? with an integral, and samples the contribution from dates ? one week apart for the next year, and one month apart for subsequent years. 8 3. Callable accrual swaps. A callable accrual swap is an accrual swap in which the party paying the coupon leg has the right to cancel on any coupon date after a lock-out period expires. For example, a 10NC3 with 5 business days notice can be called on any coupon date, starting on the third anniversary, provided the appropriate notice is given 5 days before the coupon date. We will value the accrual swap from the viewpoint of the receiver, who would price the callable accrual swap as the full accrual swap (coupon leg minus funding leg) minus the Bermudan option to enter into the receiver accrual swap. So a 10NC3 cancellable quarterly accrual swap would be priced as the 10 year bullet quarterly receiver accrual swap minus the Bermudan option – with quarterly exercise dates starting in year 3 – to receive the remainder of the coupon leg and pay the remainder of the funding leg. Accordingly, here we price Bermudan options into receiver accrual swaps. Bermudan options on payer accrual swaps can be priced similarly. There are two key requirements in pricing Bermudan accrual swaps. First, as Rmin decreases and Rmax increases, the value of the Bermudan accrual swap should reduce to the value of an ordinary Bermudan swaption with strike Rf ix . Besides the obvious theoretical appeal, meeting this requirement allows one to hedge the callability of the accrual swap by selling an o? setting Bermudan swaption. This criterion requires using the same the interest rate model and calibration method for Bermudan accrual notes as would be used for Bermudan swaptions. Following standard practice, one would calibrate the Bermudan accrual note to the â€Å"diagonal swaptions† struck at the accrual note’s â€Å"e? ective strikes. † For example, a 10NC3 accrual swap which is callable quarterly starting in year 3 would be calibrated to the 3 into 7, the 3. 25 into 6. 75, †¦ , the i 8. 75 into 1. 25, and the 9 into 1 swaptions. The strike Ref f for each of these â€Å"reference swaptions† would be chosen so that for swaption i, (3. 1) value of the ? xed leg value of all accrual swap coupons j ? i = value of the ? oating leg value of the accrual swap’s funding leg ? i This usually results in strikes Ref f that are not too far from the money. In the preceding section we showed that each coupon of the accrual swap can be written as a combination of vanilla ? oorlets, and therefore the market value of each coupon is known exactly. The second requirement is that the valuation procedure should reproduce today’s m arket value of each coupon exactly. In fact, if there is a 25% chance of exercising into the accrual swap on or before the j th exercise date, the pricing methodology should yield 25% of the vega risk of the ? oorlets that make up the j th coupon payment. E? ectively this means that the pricing methodology needs to use the correct market volatilities for ? oorlets struck at Rmin and Rmax . This is a fairly sti? requirement, since we now need to match swaptions struck at i Ref f and ? oorlets struck at Rmin and Rmax . This is why callable range notes are considered heavily skew depedent products. 3. 1. Hull-White model. Meeting these requirements would seem to require using a model that is sophisticated enough to match the ? oorlet smiles exactly, as well as the diagonal swaption volatilities. Such a model would be complex, calibration would be di? ult, and most likely the procedure would yield unstable hedges. An alternative approach is to use a much simpler model to match the diagonal swaption prices, and then use â€Å"internal adjusters† to match the ? oorlet volatilities. Here we follow this approach, using the 1 factor linear Gauss Markov (LGM) model with internal adjusters to price Bermudan options on accrual swaps. Speci ? cally, we ? nd explicit formulas for the LGM model’s prices of standard ? oorlets. This enables us to compose the accrual swap â€Å"payo? s† (the value recieved at each node in the tree if the Bermudan is exercised) as a linear combination of the vanilla ? orlets. With the payo? s known, the Bermudan can be evaluated via a standard rollback. The last step is to note that the LGM model misprices the ? oorlets that make up the accrual swap coupons, and use internal adjusters to correct this mis-pricing. Internal adjusters can be used with other models, but the mathematics is more complex. 3. 1. 1. LGM. The 1 factor LGM model is exactly the Hull-White model expressed as an HJM model. The 1 factor LGM model has a single state variable x that determines the entire yield curve at any time t. 9 This model can be summarized in three equations. The ? st is the Martingale valuation formula: At any date t and state x, the value of any deal is given by the formula, Z V (t, x) V (T, X) (3. 2a) = p(t, x; T, X) dX for any T t. N (t, x) N (T, X) Here p(t, x; T, X) is the probability that the state variable is in state X at date T , given that it is in state x at date t. For the LGM model, the transition density is Gaussian 2 1 e? (X? x) /2[? (T ) (t)] , p(t, x; T, X) = p 2? [? (T ) ? ?(t)] (3. 2b) with a variance of ? (T ) ? ?(t). The numeraire is (3. 2c) N (t, x) = 1 h(t)x+ 1 h2 (t)? (t) 2 , e D(t) for reasons that will soon become apparent. Without loss of generality, one sets x = 0 at t = 0, and today’s variance is zero: ? (0) = 0. The ratio (3. 3a) V (t, x) ? V (t, x) ? N (t, x) is usually called the reduced value of the deal. Since N (0, 0) = 1, today’s value coincides with today’s reduced value: (3. 3b) V (0, 0) ? V (0, 0) = V (0, 0) ? . N (0, 0) So we only have to work with reduced values to get today’s prices.. De? ne Z(t, x; T ) to be the value of a zero coupon bond with maturity T , as seen at t, x. It’s value can be found by substituting 1 for V (T, X) in the Martingale valuation formula. This yields (3. 4a) 1 2 Z(t, x; T ) ? Z(t, x; T ) ? = D(T )e? (T )x? 2 h (T )? (t) . N (t, x) Since the forward rates are de? ned through (3. 4b) Z(t, x; T ) ? e? T t f (t,x;T 0 )dT 0 , ? taking ? ?T log Z shows that the forward rates are (3. 4c) f (t, x; T ) = f0 (T ) + h0 (T )x + h0 (T )h(T )? (t). This last equation captures the LGM model in a nutshell. The curves h(T ) and ? (t) are model parameters that need to be set by calibration or by a priori reasoning. The above formula shows that at any date t, the forward rate curve is given by today’s forward rate curve f0 (T ) plus x times a second curve h0 (T ), where x is a Gaussian random variable with mean zero and variance ? (t). Thus h0 (T ) determines possible shapes of the forward curve and ? (t) determines the width of the distribution of forward curves. The last term h0 (T )h(T )? (t) is a much smaller convexity correction. 10 3. 1. 2. Vanilla prices under LGM. Let L(t, x; ? st ) be the forward value of the k month Libor rate for the period ? st to ? end , as seen at t, x. Regardless of model, the forward value of the Libor rate is given by (3. 5a) where (3. 5b) ? = cvg(? st , ? end ) L(t, x; ? st ) = Z(t, x; ? st ) ? Z(t, x; ? end ) + bs(? st ) = Ltrue (t, x; ? st ) + bs(? st ), ? Z(t, x; ? end ) is the day count fraction of the interval. Here Ltrue is the forward â€Å"true rate† for the interval and bs(? ) is the Libor rate’s basis spread for the period starting at ? . Let F (t, x; ? st , K) be the value at t, x of a ? oorlet with strike K on the Libor rate L(t, x; ? st ). On the ? xing date ? f ix the payo? is (3. 6) ?  ¤+ F (? f ix , xf ix ; ? st , K) = ? K ? L(? f ix , xf ix ; ? st ) Z(? f ix , xf ix ; ? end ), where xf ix is the state variable on the ? xing date. Substituting for L(? ex , xex ; ? st ), the payo? becomes (3. 7a)  · ? + F (? f ix , xf ix ; ? st , K) Z(? f ix , xf ix ; ? st ) Z(? f ix , xf ix ; ? end ) . = 1 + ? (K ? bs(? st )) ? N (? ix , xf ix ) N (? f ix , xf ix ) Z(? f ix , xf ix ; ? end ) Knowing the value of the ? oorlet on the ? xing date, we can use the Martingale valuation formula to ? nd the value on any earlier date t: Z 2 1 F (t, x; ? st , K) F (? f ix , xf ix ; ? st , K) e? (xf ix ? x) /2[? f ix ] =q dxf ix , (3. 7b) N (t, x) N (? f ix , xf ix ) 2? [? f ix ? ?] where ? f ix = ? (? f ix ) and ? = ? (t). Substituting the zero coupon bond formula 3. 4a and the payo? 3. 7a into the integral yields (3. 8a) where log (3. 8b) ? 1,2 =  µ 1 + ? (K ? bs) 1 + ? (L ? bs)  ¤ ?  ± 1 (hend ? hst )2 ? f ix ? ?(t) 2 q , (hend ? hst ) ? f ix ? (t)  ¶ F (t, x; ? st , K) = Z(t, x; ? end ) {[1 + ? (K ? bs)]N (? 1 ) ? [1 + ? (L ? bs)]N (? 2 )} , and where L ? L(t, x; ? st ) = (3. 8c)  µ  ¶ 1 Z(t, x; ? st ) ? 1 + bs(? st ) ? Z(t, x; ? end )  ¶  µ 1 Dst (hend ? hst )x? 1 (h2 ? h2 )? end st 2 = e ? 1 + bs(? st ) ? Dend 11 is the forward Libor rate for the period ? st to ? end , as seen at t, x. Here hst = h(? st ) and hend = h(? end ). For future reference, it is convenient to split o? the zero coupon bond value Z(t, x; ? end ). So de? ne the forwarded ? oorlet value by (3. 9) Ff (t, x; ? st , K) = F (t, x; ? st , K) Z(t, x; ? end ) = [1 + ? (K ? bs)]N (? 1 ) ? [1 + ? L(t, x; ? st ) ? bs)]N (? 2 ). Equations 3. 8a and 3. 9 are just Black’s formul as for the value of a European put option on a log normal asset, provided we identify (3. 10a) (3. 10b) (3. 10c) (3. 10d) 1 + ? (L ? bs) = asset’s forward value, 1 + ? (K ? bs) = strike, ? end = settlement date, and p ? f ix ? ? (hend ? hst ) v = ? = asset volatility, tf ix ? t where tf ix ? t is the time-to-exercise. One should not confuse ? , which is the ? oorlet’s â€Å"price volatility,† with the commonly quoted â€Å"rate volatility. † 3. 1. 3. Rollback. Obtaining the value of the Bermudan is straightforward, given the explicit formulas for the ? orlets, . Suppose that the LGM model has been calibrated, so the â€Å"model parameters† h(t) and ? (t) are known. (In Appendix A we show one popular calibration method). Let the Bermudan’s noti? cation dates be tex , tex+1 , . . . , tex . Suppose that if we exercise on date tex , we receive all coupon payments for the K k0 k0 k intervals k + 1, . . . , n and recieve all funding leg payments f or intervals ik , ik + 1, . . . , n. ? The rollback works by induction. Assume that in the previous rollback steps, we have calculated the reduced value (3. 11a) V + (tex , x) k = value at tex of all remaining exercises tex , tex . . . , tex k k+1 k+2 K N (tex , x) k at each x. We show how to take one more step backwards, ? nding the value which includes the exercise tex k at the preceding exercise date: (3. 11b) V + (tex , x) k? 1 = value at tex of all remaining exercises tex , tex , tex . . . . , tex . k? 1 k k+1 k+2 K N (tex , x) k? 1 Let Pk (x)/N (tex , x) be the (reduced) value of the payo? obtained if the Bermudan is exercised at tex . k k As seen at the exercise date tex the e? ective notional for date ? st is k (3. 12a) where we recall that (3. 12b) ? = ? end (? st ) ? tj , ? end (? st ) ? ? st ? = cvg(? st , ? end (? st )). 12 A(tex , x, ? t ) = k ?j Rf ix Z(tex , x; tj ) 1 k , Mj Z(tex , x; ? end ) 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k k Reconstructing the reduced value of the payo? (see equation 2. 15) yields (3. 13a) Pk (x) = N (tex , x) k n X ? j Rf ix Z(tex , x; tj ) k Mj N (tex , x) ? k tj X j=k+1 st =tj? 1 +1 ? 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmax + 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k ? ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmax ? 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmin + 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) 2 + Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmin ? 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k ? n ? X ? ? Z(tex , x, tik ? 1 ) ? Z(tex , x, tn ) Z(tex , x, ti ) k k k ? ? cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(bsi +mi ) ? ex , x) ex , x) . N (tk N (tk i=i +1 k ? This payo? includes only zero coupon bonds and ? oorlets, so we can calculate this reduced payo? explicitly using the previously derived formula 3. 9. The reduced valued including the kth exercise is clearly ? ? Pk (x) V + (tex , x) V (tex , x) k k = max , at each x. (3. 13b) N (tex , x) N (tex , x) N (tex , x) k k k Using the Martingale valuation formula we can â€Å"roll di? erences, trees, convolution, or direct integration to Z V + (tex , x) 1 k? 1 (3. 3c) =p N (tex , x) 2? [? k ? ? k? 1 ] k? 1 back† to the preceding exercise date by using ? nite compute the integral V (tex , X) ? (X? x)2 /2[? k k? 1 ] k dX e N (tex , X) k at each x. Here ? k = ? (tex ) and ? k? 1 = ? (tex ). k k? 1 At this point we have moved from tex to the preceding exercise date tex . We now repeat the procedure: k k? 1 at each x we t ake the max of V + (tex , x)/N (tex , x) and the payo? Pk? 1 (x)/N (tex , x) for tex , and then k? 1 k? 1 k? 1 k? 1 use the valuation formula to roll-back to the preceding exercise date tex , etc. Eventually we work our way k? 2 througn the ? rst exercise V (tex , x). Then today’s value is found by a ? nal integration: k0 Z V (tex , X) ? X 2 /2? V (0, 0) 1 k0 k0 dX. (3. 14) V (0, 0) = =p e N (0, 0) N (tex , X) 2 k0 k0 3. 2. Using internal adjusters. The above pricing methodology satis? es the ? rst criterion: Provided we use LGM (Hull-White) to price our Bermudan swaptions, and provided we use the same calibration method for accrual swaps as for Bermudan swaptions, the above procedure will yield prices that reduce to the Bermudan prices as Rmin goes to zero and Rmax becomes large. However the LGM model yields the following formulas for today’s values of the standard ? orlets: F (0, 0; ? st , K) = D(? end ) {[1 + ? (K ? bs)]N (? 1 ) ? [1 + ? (L0 ? bs)]N (? 2 )} log  µ  ¶ 1 + ? (K ? bs)  ± 1 ? 2 tf ix 2 mod 1 + ? (L0 ? bs) . v ? mod tf ix 13 (3. 15a) where (3. 15b) ?1,2 = Here (3. 15c) L0 = Dst ? Dend + bs(? st ) ? Dend is today’s forward value for the Libor rate, and (3. 15d) q ? mod = (hend ? hst ) ? f ix /tf ix 3. 2. 1. Obtaining the market vol. Floorlets are quoted in terms of the ordinary (rate) vol. Suppose the rate vol is quoted as ? imp (K). Then today’s market price of the ? oorlet is is the asset’s log normal volatility according to the LGM model. We did not calibrate the LGM model to these ? oorlets. It is virtually certain that matching today’s market prices for the ? oorlets will require using q an implied (price) volatility ? mkt which di? ers from ? mod = (hend ? hst ) ? f ix /tf ix . (3. 16a) where (3. 16b) Fmkt (? st , K) = ? D(? end ) {KN (d1 ) ? L0 N (d2 )} d1,2 = log K/L0  ± 1 ? 2 (K)tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K) tf ix The price vol ? mkt is the volatility that equates the LGM ? oorlet value to this market value. It is de? ned implicitly by (3. 17a) with log (3. 17b) ? 1,2 =  µ  ¶ 1 + ? (K ? bs)  ± 1 ? 2 tf ix 2 mkt 1 + ? (L0 ? bs) v ? kt tf ix [1 + ? (K ? bs)]N (? 1 ) ? [1 + ? (L0 ? bs)]N (? 2 ) = ? KN (d1 ) ? ?L0 N (d2 ), (3. 17c) d1,2 = log K/L0  ± 1 ? 2 (K)tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K) tf ix Equivalent vol techniques can be used to ? nd the price vol ? mkt (K) which corresponds to the market-quoted implied rate vol ? imp (K) : (3. 18) ? imp (K) = 1 + 5760 ? 4 t2 ix +  ·  ·  · 1+ imp f ? mkt (K) 1 2 1 4 2 24 ? mkt tf ix + 5760 ? mkt tf ix  µ log L0 /K  ¶ 1 + ? (L0 ? bs) 1 + ? (K ? bs) 1+ 1 2 24 ? imp tf ix log If this approximation is not su? ciently accurate, we can use a single Newton step to attain any reasonable accuracy. 14 igital floorlet value ? mod ? mkt L0/K Fig. 3. 1. Unadjusted and adjusted digital payo? L/K 3. 2. 2. Adjusting the price vol. The price vol ? mkt obtained from the market price will not match the q LGM model’s price vol ? mod = (hend ? hst ) ? f ix /tf ix . This is easily remedied using an internal adjuster. All one does is multiply the model volatility with the factor needed to bring it into line with the actual market volatility, and use this factor when calculating the payo? s. Speci? cally, in calculating each payo? Pk (x)/N (tex , x) in the rollback (see eq. 3. 13a), one makes the replacement k (3. 9) (3. 20) (hend ? hst ) q q ? mkt ? f ix ? ?(tex ) =? (hend ? hst ) ? f ix ? ?(t) k ? mod q p = 1 ? ?(tex )/? (tf ix )? mkt tf ix . k With the internal adjusters, the pricing methodology now satis? es the second criteria: it agrees with all the vanilla prices that make up the range note coupons. Essentially, all the adjuster does is to slightly â€Å"sharpen up† or â€Å"smear out† the digital ? oorlet’s payo? to match today’s value at L0 /K. This results in slightly positive or negative price corrections at various values of L/K, but these corrections average out to zero when averaged over all L/K. Making this volatility adjustment is vastly superior to the other commonly used adjustment method, which is to add in a ? ctitious â€Å"exercise fee† to match today’s coupon value. Adding a fee gives a positive or negative bias to the payo? for all L/K, even far from the money, where the payo? was certain to have been correct. Meeting the second criterion forced us to go outside the model. It is possible that there is a subtle arbitrage to our pricing methodology. (There may or may not be an arbitrage free model in which extra factors – positively or negatively correlated with x – enable us to obtain exactly these ? orlet prices while leaving our Gaussian rollback una? ected). However, not matching today’s price of the underlying accrual swap would be a direct and immediate arbitrage. 15 4. Range notes and callable range notes. In an accrual swap, the coupon leg is exchanged for a funding leg, which is normally a standard Libor leg plus a margin. U nlike a bond, there is no principle at risk. The only credit risk is for the di? erence in value between the coupon leg and the ? oating leg payments; even this di? erence is usually collateralized through various inter-dealer arrangements. Since swaps are indivisible, liquidity is not an issue: they can be unwound by transferring a payment of the accrual swap’s mark-to-market value. For these reasons, there is no detectable OAS in pricing accrual swaps. A range note is an actual bond which pays the coupon leg on top of the principle repayments; there is no funding leg. For these deals, the issuer’s credit-worthiness is a key concern. One needs to use an option adjusted spread (OAS) to obtain the extra discounting re? ecting the counterparty’s credit spread and liquidity. Here we analyze bullet range notes, both uncallable and callable. The coupons Cj of these notes are set by the number of days an index (usually Libor) sets in a speci? ed range, just like accrual swaps: ? tj X ? j Rf ix 1 if Rmin ? L(? st ) ? Rmax (4. 1a) Cj = , 0 otherwise Mj ? =t +1 st j? 1 where L(? st ) is k month Libor for the interval ? st to ? end (? st ), and where ? j and Mj are the day count fraction and the total number of days in the j th coupon interval tj? 1 to tj . In addition, these range notes repay the principle on the ? nal pay date, so the (bullet) range note payments are: (4. 1b) (4. 1c) Cj 1 + Cn paid on tj , paid on tn . j = 1, 2, . . . n ? 1, For callable range notes, let the noti? ation on dates be tex for k = k0 , k0 + 1, . . . , K ? 1, K with K n. k Assume that if the range note is called on tex , then the strike price Kk is paid on coupon date tk and the k payments Cj are cancelled for j = k + 1, . . . , n. 4. 1. Modeling option adjusted spreads. Suppose a range note is issued by issuer A. ZA (t, x; T ) to be the value of a dollar paid by the note on date T , as seen at t, x. We assume that (4. 2) ZA (t, x; T ) = Z(t, x; T ) ? (T ) , ? (t) De? ne where Z(t, x; T ) is the value according to the Libor curve, and (4. 3) ? (? ) = DA (? ) . e D(? ) Here ? is the OAS of the range note. The choice of the discount curve DA (? ) depends on what we wish the OAS to measure. If one wishes to ? nd the range note’s value relative to the issuer’s other bonds, then one should use the issuer’s discount curve for DA (? ); the OAS then measures the note’s richness or cheapness compared to the other bonds of issuer A. If one wishes to ? nd the note’s value relative to its credit risk, then the OAS calculation should use the issuer’s â€Å"risky discount curve† or for the issuer’s credit rating’s risky discount curve for DA (? ). If one wishes to ? nd the absolute OAS, then one should use the swap market’s discount curve D(? , so that ? (? ) is just e . When valuing a non-callable range note, we are just determining which OAS ? is needed to match the current price. I. e. , the OAS needed to match the market’s idiosyncratic preference or adversion of the bond. When valuing a callable range note, we are ma king a much more powerful assumption. By assuming that the same ? can be used in evaluating the calls, we are assuming that (1) the issuer would re-issue the bonds if it could do so more cheaply, and (2) on each exercise date in the future, the issuer could issue debt at the same OAS that prevails on today’s bond. 16 4. 2. Non-callable range notes. Range note coupons are ? xed by Libor settings and other issuerindependent criteria. Thus the value of a range note is obtained by leaving the coupon calculations alone, and replacing the coupon’s discount factors D(tj ) with the bond-appropriate DA (tj )e tj : (4. 4a) VA (0) = n X j=1 ?j Rf ix DA (tj )e tj Mj  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) B1 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) B2 (? st ) 2 2 ? [1 + L0 (? st )] ? st =tj? 1 +1  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) B3 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) B4 (? st ) 2 2 ? ? [1 + L0 (? st )] +DA (tn )e tn . tj X Here the last term DA (tn )e n is the value of the notional repaid at maturity. As before, the B? are Black’s formulas, (4. 4b) B? (? st ) = Kj N (d? ) ? L0 (? st )N (d? ) 1 2 (4. 4c) d? = 1,2 log K? /L0 (? st )  ± 1 ? 2 (K? )tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K? ) tf ix (4. 4d) K1,2 = Rmax  ± 1 ? , 2 K3,4 = Rmin  ± 1 ? , 2 and L0 (? ) is today’s forward rate: (4. 4e) Finally, (4. 4f) ? = ? end ? tj . ? en d ? ? st L0 (? st ) = D(? st ) ? D(? end ) ? D(? end ) 4. 3. Callable range notes. We price the callable range notes via the same Hull-White model as used to price the cancelable accrual swap. We just need to adjust the coupon discounting in the payo? function. Clearly the value of the callable range note is the value of the non-callable range note minus the value of the call: (4. 5) callable bullet Berm VA (0) = VA (0) ? VA (0). bullet Berm (0) is the today’s value of the non-callable range note in 4. 4a, and VA (0) is today’s value of Here VA the Bermudan option. This Bermudan option is valued using exactly the same rollback procedure as before, 17 except that now the payo? is (4. 6a) (4. 6b) Pk (x) = N (tex , x) k ? tj X st =tj? 1 +1 j=k+1 n X ? j Rf ix ZA (tex , x; tj ) k Mj N (tex , x) ? k 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmax + 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k ? ? + (Rmax + 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmax ? 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) 2 Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmin + 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) 2 + Ff (tex , x; ? st , Rmin ? 1 ? ) k 2 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k ZA (tex , x, tn ) ZA (tex , x, tk ) k k + ? Kk ex , x) N (tk N (tex , x) k Here the bond speci? c reduced zero coupon bond value is (4. 6c) ex ex 1 2 ZA (tex , x, T ) D(tex ) k k = DA (T )e (T ? tk ) e? h(T )x? 2 h (T )? k , ex , x) N (tk DA (tex ) k ? the (adjusted) forwarded ? oorlet value is Ff (tex , x; ? st , K) = [1 + ? (K ? bs)]N (? 1 ) ? [1 + ? (L(tex , x; ? t ) ? bs)]N (? 2 ) k k log (4. 6d) ? 1,2 =  µ  ¶ 1 + ? (K ? bs)  ± 1 [1 ? ?(tex )/? (tf ix )]? 2 tf ix k mkt 2 1 + ? (L ? bs) p , v 1 ? ?(tex )/? (tf ix )? mkt tf ix k  ¶ Z(tex , x; ? st ) k ? 1 + bs(? st ) Z(tex , x; ? end ) k  ¶ (hend ? hst )x? 1 (h2 ? h2 )? ex end st k ? 1 + bs(? 2 e st ) 1 = ?  µ and the forward Libor value is (4. 6e) (4. 6f) L? L (tex , x; ? st ) k  µ Dst Dend 1 = ? The only remaining issue is calibration. For range notes, we should use constant mean reversion and calibrate along the diagonal, exactly as we did for the cancelable accrual swaps. We only need to specify the strikes of the reference swaptions. A good method is to transfer the basis spreads and margin to the coupon leg, and then match the ratio of the coupon leg to the ? oating leg. For exercise on date tk , this ratio yields (4. 7a) n X ?k = ? j Rf ix DA (tj )e (tj ? tk ) Mj Kk DA (tk ) j=k+1 (?  ¤ ?  ¤ 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) B1 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) B1 (? st ) 2 2 ? [1 + L0 (? st )] ? st =tj? 1 +1 )  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) B3 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) B3 (? st ) 2 2 ? 1 + Lf (tex , x; ? st ) k tj X + DA (tn )e (tn ? tk ) Kk DA (tk ) 18 As before, the Bj are dimensionless Black formulas, (4. 7b) B? (? st ) = K? N (d? ) ? L0 (? st )N (d? ) 1 2 d? = 1,2 log K? /L0 (? st )  ± 1 ? 2 (K? )tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K? ) tf ix K3,4 = Rmin  ± 1 ? , 2 (4. 7c) (4. 7d) K1,2 = Rmax  ± 1 ? , 2 and L0 (? st ) is today’s forward rate: Appendix A. Calibrating the LGM model. The are several methods of calibrating the LGM model for pricing a Bermudan swaption. The most popular method is to choose a constant mean reversion ? , and then calibrate on the diagonal European swaptions making up the Bermudan. In the LGM model, a â€Å"constant mean reversion ? † means that the model function h(t) is given by (A. 1) h(t) = 1 ? e t . ? Usually the value of ? s selected from a table of values that are known to yield the correct market prices of liquid Bermudans; It is known empirically that the needed mean reversion parameters are very, very stable, changing little from year to year. ? 1M 3M 6M 1Y 3Y 5Y 7Y 10Y 1Y -1. 00% -0. 75% -0. 50% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 50% 2Y -0. 50% -0. 25% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 3Y -0. 25% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 1. 75% 4Y -0. 25% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 1. 75% 5Y -0. 25% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 1. 75% 7Y -0. 25% 0. 00% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 1. 75% 10Y -0. 25% 0. 0% 0. 25% 0. 50% 1. 00% 1. 25% 1. 50% 1. 75% Table A. 1 Mean reverssion ? for Bermudan swaptions. Rows are time-to-? rst exercise; columns are tenor of the longest underlying swap obtained upon exercise. With h(t) known, we only need determine ? (t) by calibrating to European swaptions. Consider a European swaption with noti? cation date tex . Suppose that if one exercises the option, one recieves a ? xed leg worth (A. 2a) Vf ix (t, x) = n X i=1 Rf ix cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix )Z(t, x; ti ), and pays a ? oating leg worth (A. 2b) Vf lt (t, x) = Z(t, x; t0 ) ? Z(t, x; tn ) + n X i=1 cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf lt ) bsi Z(t, x; ti ). 9 Here cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix ) and cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf lt ) are the day count fraction s for interval i using the ? xed leg and ? oating leg day count bases. (For simplicity, we are cheating slightly by applying the ? oating leg’s basis spread at the frequency of the ? xed leg. Mea culpa). Adjusting the basis spread for the di? erence in the day count bases (A. 3) bsnew = i cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf lt ) bsi cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix ) allows us to write the value of the swap as (A. 4) Vswap (t, x) = Vf ix (t, x) ? Vf lt (t, x) n X = (Rf ix ? bsi ) cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix )Z(t, x; ti ) + Z(t, x; tn ) ? Z(t, x; t0 ) i=1 Under the LGM model, today’s value of the swaption is (A. 5) 1 Vswptn (0, 0) = p 2 (tex ) Z e? xex /2? (tex ) 2 [Vswap (tex , xex )]+ dxex N (tex , xex ) Substituting the explicit formulas for the zero coupon bonds and working out the integral yields (A. 6a) n X (Rf ix ? bsi ) cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix )D(ti )N Vswptn (0, 0) = where y is determined implicitly via (A. 6b) y + [h(ti ) ? h(t0 )] ? ex p ? ex i=1 A A ! ! y + [h(tn ) ? h(t0 )] ? ex y p ? D(t0 )N p , +D(tn )N ? ex ? ex A ! n X 2 1 (Rf ix ? bsi ) cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix )e? [h(ti )? h(t0 )]y? 2 [h(ti )? h(t0 )] ? ex i=1 +D(tn )e? [h(tn )? h(t0 )]y? [h(tn )? h(t0 )] 1 2 ? ex = D(t0 ). The values of h(t) are known for all t, so the only unknown parameter in this price is ? (tex ). One can show that the value of the swaption is an increasing function of ? (tex ), so there is exactly one ? (tex ) which matches the LGM value of the swaption to its market price. This solution is easily found via a global Newton iteration. T o price a Bermudan swaption, one typcially calibrates on the component Europeans. For, say, a 10NC3 Bermudan swaption struck at 8. 2% and callable quarterly, one would calibrate to the 3 into 7 swaption struck at 8. 2%, the 3. 25 into 6. 5 swaption struck at 8. 2%, †¦ , then 8. 75 into 1. 25 swaption struck at 8. 25%, and ? nally the 9 into 1 swaption struck at 8. 2%. Calibrating each swaption gives the value of ? (t) on the swaption’s exercise date. One generally uses piecewise linear interpolation to obtain ? (t) at dates between the exercise dates. The remaining problem is to pick the strike of the reference swaptions. A good method is to transfer the basis spreads and margin to the coupon leg, and then match the ratio of the coupon leg to the funding leg to the equivalent ratio for a swaption. For the exercise on date tk , this ratio is de? ed to be 20 n X ? j D(tj ) (A. 7a) ? k = Mj D(tk ) ? j=k+1 D(tn ) X D(ti ) + cvg(ti? 1 , ti )(bs0 +mi ) ? i D(tk ) i=1 D(tk ) n  ¤ ?  ¤ 1 + (Rmax ? 1 ? ) B1 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmax + 1 ? ) B2 (? st ) 2 2 ? [1 + L0 (? st )] st =tj? 1 +1  ¤ ?  ¤ ? 1 + (Rmin ? 1 ? ) B3 (? st ) ? 1 + (Rmin + 1 ? ) B4 (? st ) 2 2 ? ? [1 + L0 (? st )] tj X ? where B? are Black’s formula at strikes around the boundaries: (A. 7b) B? (? st ) = ? D(? end ) {K? N (d? ) ? L0 (? st )N (d? )} 1 2 d? = 1,2 log K? /L0 (? st )  ± 1 ? 2 (K? )tf ix 2 imp v ? imp (K? ) tf ix (A. 7c) with (A. 7d) K1,2 = Rmax  ± 1 ? , 2 K3,4 = Rmin  ± 1 ?. 2 This is to be matched to the swaption whose swap starts on tk and ends on tn , with the strike Rf ix chosen so that the equivalent ratio matches the ? k de? ned above: (A. 7e) ? k = n X i=k+1 (Rf ix ? bsi ) cvg(ti? 1 , ti , dcbf ix ) D(ti ) D(tn ) + D(tk ) D(tk ) The above methodology works well for deals that are similar to bullet swaptions. For some exotics, such as amortizing deals or zero coupon callables, one may wish to choose both the tenor of the and the strike of the reference swaptions. This allows one to match the exotic deal’s duration as well as its moneyness. Appendix B. Floating rate accrual notes. 21 How to cite Accrual Swaps, Papers

The Unemployment Reasons in the UAE

The unemployment rate has been on the rise in the United Arabs Emirates for the last five decades. According to recent statistics, the current rate of unemployment stands at 13.5 % and the figure is expected to continue rising if appropriate measures are not taken to deal with the situation (Katzman 35). It is estimated that 38% of the UAE nationals within the working age have no jobs. The major concern about unemployment situation is that almost 30% of University graduates still remain unemployed (Katzman 35).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on The Unemployment Reasons in the UAE specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The policymakers in the UAE have a very serious problem to deal with if they intend to avoid potential social issues. The youth are the most affected by the unemployment problem with statistics indicating that almost 12% of the Emirati youths are jobless (Gonzalez 112). This paper will highlight some of the main reasons for unemployment in the UAE and what should be done to deal with the crisis. The education system in the UAE does not prepare students well for the job market (Gonzalez 112). Students find it difficult to adapt to the work environment because their training is inadequate. A good number of young people in the UAE were surveyed and most of them confessed that they were not prepared to cope with the work requirements especially those to do with communication. English and Arabic are the major languages in the UAE and almost 58% of graduates can not communicate effectively in either of the two languages (Gonzalez 112). Communication problems are a major factor in the unemployment situation in the UAE. Colleges and universities in the UAE have failed in their role of equipping students with the relevant practical skills that are needed in the job market (Uz Zaman 67). The training offered to students with institutions of higher learning leaves them with limited career option s. The unemployment rate in UAE is very high because of an influx of foreign expatriates who take the majority of employment opportunities in the country (Uz Zaman 69). A survey conducted in 2008 indicated that almost of 70% of the jobs in the UAE are occupied by foreign expatriates (Gonzalez 137). The UAE government does not have elaborate plans to create employment opportunities for the local people. A research conducted in 2008 indicated that the unemployment rate of expatriates was almost five times lower than that of locals (Gonzalez 138). Foreign expatriates are therefore another factor in the current unemployment crisis in the UAE. The third reason for the high unemployment rate in the UAE is the failure by the UAE government to come with policies and strategies aimed at creating employment for its people (Al Abed 89). It is the responsibility of any government to create employment opportunities for its people by building more industries and providing the right environment fo r the private sector to create more jobs for the locals (Al Abed 89).Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More In conclusion, the high unemployment rate in the UAE is a result of poor training, the influx of foreign expatriates and government failure to create more jobs for the locals (Katzman 35). This information is very important for the UAE government because it can use it to come up with the right training and employment policies aimed at ending this crisis. The curriculum in colleges and universities should be revised to incorporate practical training that is relevant to the job market (Katzman 39). Future government policies should aim at creating more employment opportunities for the local people. The UAE government should give locals the first priority when it comes to hiring as a way of reducing the gap between the employment rates for expatriates and locals (Al Abed 96). Q uality training programs promote economic growth because of increased productivity. Works Cited Al Abed, Ibrahim. United Arabs Emirates Yearbook 2006. London: Trident Press Ltd., 2006. Print. Gonzalez, Gabriella. Facing Human Capital Challenges of the 21st Century: Education and Labor. London: Rand Corporation, 2009. Print. Katzman, Kenneth. United Arab Emirates (UAE): Issues for U.S Policy. New York: Diane Publishing, 2010. Print. Uz Zaman, Nadeem. Uae and Globalization-Attracting Foreign Investments. London: GRIN Verlag, 2011. Print. This essay on The Unemployment Reasons in the UAE was written and submitted by user Jabari Owen to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.